Thursday, December 8, 2016

Kardashian Korner

People reports that The Kardashians are blocking former stripper and current THOT Blac Chyna, birth name Angela Renée White, from becoming a Kardashian, at least publicly. And by "The Kardashians," I mean Kim, Kourtney, and Khloé. They are the only Kardashians that are allowed to Kardashian. Kris can't Kardashian, she can only Jenner. Same with Kendall and Kylie. Even Kim and Kourtney's children aren't allowed to Kardashian; they're Wests and Disicks, respectively. You would think that Rob would be allowed to Kardashian, but sadly the existence of his penis, however small, precludes him from being able to Kardashian. 

When The Kardashians learned that Blac Chyna was trying to become Angela Renée Kardashian without even marrying their brother (who isn't even allowed to Kardashian in the first place, he can only Arthur George), they filed the following with the court: "[The Kardashians will] suffer damage including irreparable injury to their reputation and goodwill [if Blac Chyna is allowed to Kardashian, and that THOT is] deliberately seeking to profit from the goodwill and popularity [of The Kardashians].”

As for Blac Chyna, her lawyer had this to say to People:
“The Kardashians, like Angela and my other clients are very protective of our marks, I think for us this is going to be a clear case win, because it’s actually her name, it’s not a poaching. I would hope that this is just a junior lawyer’s error, who’s just responding to everything and not really looking at who it’s from or why it was filed. There’s a softer side of this where Angela has to have a conversation with her family. But until I hear otherwise, I’m just going to proceed as I normally would with a lawsuit. I have 40 days to respond.

I have to respond to the notice of opposition, so the way this works is we filed the mark, it was initially unopposed, it was published and then the representatives of the sisters’ companies filed an opposition to Angela owning her name. Sure, it’s not her legal name now, but it is certainly her stage name — her next stage name and her legal name once the wedding is done. In the complaint they are not short or shy as to how they feel about Angela using the trademark. I’m hoping that it’s just a big misunderstanding but I’m just proceeding as if it’s not and am going to do the best work I can for my client.

I filed this trademark with the utmost confidence that it would not be opposed at all. I did not foresee this, but in retrospect maybe I could have, all things considered. I’m going to zealously represent my client in a trademark we legally filed and a name that we feel like we own and need to protect.”

Hmmm, I don't think that Rob is going to be invited to Krismas this year.

No comments:

Post a Comment